Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

Help with designing your track work
Post Reply
Too Tall
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:21 pm
Contact:

Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

#1

Post by Too Tall »

Hi all, As I am working on my layout, I had to tweak plans as I had Peco Streamline track spacing and even though I had minimum curves of 21 inches (Approx.set-track R3.5) at any point, it became obvious the clearance on corners may be an issue for longer coaches with large loco's like a Princess class.
My plans (on this forum) are to have a 2 height layout, but essentially 2 separate tracks.
While I was tweaking the curves for more distance beteween, I thought maybe I could have one of my upper level tracks have a bit of a dip as an aesthetic feature.

My questions are:

1: would essentially parallel tracks ever have been like this on UK railways (I presume they would flatten it so parallel tracks were the same height in reality) ?

2.the inclines would be around 1.4% and at the lowest point would be 1 inch below the adjacent track. Aas its a dual track trains would only run CCW on this track, so the decline would be mostly a 26.5" radius curve with a length of around 72", leading to around 62.5 inches of low level running fairly straight, then onto an incline the same length and gradient as the decline, but running up a slow S curve starting out as a 36" Radius, and opening out to 50 inches before leveling just before a bridge.

3: Can anyone anticipate this giving issues with running. This track will be running anything from 0-6-0 to 2-10-0 steam locos, running rakes of 4-6 coaches depending on loco, or similar length goods trains.

To paraphrase Yoda: Do,or do not? Your thoughts would be appreciated :)
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 5084
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

#2

Post by Walkingthedog »

There is a section of track on the Chiltern Line in Bucks where the lines separate. One goes out of sight of the other and at a different level. One section goes through a short tunnel the other doesn’t.
Image
Nurse, the screens!
Too Tall
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2023 2:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

#3

Post by Too Tall »

Thanks WTD, thats good to know 8-)

To help visualise, this is what I am thinking of doing. The light blue is standard height, the dark blue the section 1" lower, and the mid blue are the incline/decline:

Image
Mountain Goat
Posts: 1633
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

#4

Post by Mountain Goat »

In regards to your question about the prototype, Severn Tunnel is an ideal example where track goes down at different gradients at the eastern side which I assume is to assist trains on the upward gradient out from the tunnel.
Budget modelling in 0-16.5...
User avatar
Walkingthedog
Posts: 5084
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:51 pm
Location: HAZLEMERE, BUCKS.
Contact:

Re: Gradient inclusion - yay or nay ?

#5

Post by Walkingthedog »

You need a lot of room for a gradient. 1 in 30 is the recommended max so 30 inches to go up an inch.
Nurse, the screens!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest